The Free Health Advice Center

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

Americans and Alternative Health Care (This article discusses the following issues: health care costs; wellness care saves money.)
What is Alternative Medicine?
(This article discusses the following issues:
JAMA finds traditional medicine the 3rd leading cause of death; alternative medicine is the health choice of the planet; alternative medicine treats the cause rather than the symptoms; no horrible side effects; how conventional medicine is surviving.)
Alternative Medicine Shown to Work (Researcher shows statistical evidence that alternative therapies such as special diets, herbal remedies and faith healing can cure terminal illnesses.)

 

Americans and Alternative Health Care

The January 1993 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine has published a survey which should turn the heads of those involved in our national health policy. It showed that 85 million Americans are using alternative methods for their health care needs, spending almost $14 billion of which over $10 billion is out of pocket (not covered by insurance). The study was done by Dr. David Eisenberg of Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School. His study was based on more than 1,500 randomly chosen adults in 1990, and estimates that the 425 million visits to alternative care offices was more than the number of visits to the family doctor, general practitioner and pediatrician combined (388 million visits).

While many patients utilized both types of health care, they rarely told their mainstream medical doctor of their additional alternative care. Back pain, allergy, anxiety and headaches were among the common reasons given for seeking alternative care. But classic end-stage diseases such as cancer were also reasons given.

Those patients most likely to use alternative therapies were well educated middle income whites aged 25 to 49 years old. This group also contains a high number of registered voters. It was more than a year ago that the U.S. Congress, behind Senator Tom Harkin, began pushing for more research in alternative therapies. It resulted in the National Institutes of Health new Office of Alternative Therapies which will attempt to evaluate many alternative therapies including acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and others.

Health Care Costs

Our national cost for health care rose to over $675 billion in 1990, with an estimated increase of 12% for 1991. Here are just some of the shocking facts about the health of our work force and its financial effects:
Almost 500 million work days are lost per year due to employee ill health, with back problems (93 million) and heart disease (26 million) leading the list.
… Employers pay $300 more for each smoker compared to non-smokers.
… Lost productivity due to smoking cost the economy $65 billion per year, that's $10 million per hour or $2 for each pack of cigarettes.
… Alcoholics and smokers have twice the absenteeism as other workers.
… About 14,000 person work years are lost each year in private industry due to workers who suffer from cancer. That includes $10 billion in lost earnings
.

What can be done about these problems?

One successful approach is health promotion programs implemented by some companies for their employees. An example is the Coors Brewing Company, which saves $5.50 for each dollar spent on health promotion, amounting to $3 million a year in cost savings. Specifically, it reduced absenteeism, reduced recuperation days, reduced health claims and cheaper insurance premiums.

Company programs are beginning to include educating employees on healthy lifestyles. Some offer monetary incentives for meeting wellness goals and penalty programs for not meeting goals.

Many companies now have on site fitness centers and health risk appraisal programs. The most common areas being attacked are smoking and stress. Waste Management Inc., with 36,000 employees, saves up to $15,000 per employee per year on programs they've instituted. Cardiac rehabilitation is another frequent program returning huge savings for the company. Coors, for example, has saved $2.3 million in lost wages and $1.9 million in rehabilitation costs thus far.

RETURN

WHAT IS ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE?

A 1996 report issued by the Journal of the Americal Medical Association found allopathic medicine to be the 3rd leading cause of death here in America. Since then, they have moved to the number one spot.

So what is alternative medicine? "Alternative Medicine" is defined as any protocol, action, or therapy that isn't "drugs, radiation, or surgery oriented." Wrongfully named? Yes. So-called "alternative medicine" is actually the health choice of planet earth. It is a combination of every good health idea invented by mankind, in every country and culture on this planet. There is nothing "alternative" about it. Labeling planet earth's health choice as "alternative" is, and was, a propaganda device.

North Americans have overwhelmingly (by their purchases) made "Alternative Medicine" the "health choice of the people" - for the best of reasons: it works better than allopathic, it "removes the cause" rather than "treating the symptoms," it is cost effective, it makes people feel better and think clearer, and it doesn't have all those horrible effects, and side effects, of invasive surgery or prescription drugs.

More than half of the US health dollar in 1999 was spent on "Alternative Medicine" and it was all out-of-pocket. Conventional medicine is being paid for, and is surviving, only because insurance and Medicare pay for it - the public won't spend an out-of-pocket nickel on it.

Alternative Medicine philosophies fit the "American way of thinking " (I'll make my own decisions)". Allopathic Medicine philosophies fit the "Germanic (follow my orders)" way. "Alternative Medicine" is for people who think for themselves - Americans. The door to real "alternatives" is barely open.

The future of medicine is right in front of us - it isn't in pharmaceuticals - it is in nutrition, body cleansing, prevention, oxygen therapies and energy medicine - all of which are constantly targeted by the sleaziest of the "Quackbuster" soldiers.

RETURN

 

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE SHOWN TO WORK
(Monday, 23 January 2006 11:50BNN:
British Nursing News Online · www.bnn-online.co.uk)

Researchers have found statistical evidence that alternative therapies such as special diets, herbal remedies and faith healing can cure terminal illnesses.

A study of patients with incurable lung cancer who were given weeks to live and received only low-dose radiotherapy to make the end of their lives more comfortable found a small number made complete recoveries.

Doctors followed 2,337 patients whose condition was too advanced to be cured and found that 25 had survived after five years and 18 had achieved "an apparent cure" thanks to treatment that "would not normally be considered to have any curative potential whatsoever".

Lead researcher Michael MacManus, said: "Our data indicate that a chance for prolonged survival and possibly even cure exists for approximately 1 per cent of patients with non small cell lung cancer who receive palliative radiotherapy."

"It is important that the frequency of this phenomenon should be appreciated so that claims of apparent cure by novel treatment strategies or even by unconventional medicine or 'faith healing' can be seen in an appropriate context."

Unconventional cancer cures have included vitamin C, laetrile extracted from apricot stones, and the Gershon diet of raw vegetables. Researchers believe the discovery of a small number of patients who unexpectedly recovered could provide new insights into the disease.

RETURN

 

(HOME)

The Free Health Advice Center

ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE
(Click on the article that you want to read)

Statistics Prove Prescription Drugs Are 16,400% More Deadly Than Terrorists (This article discusses the following issues: Death by Medicine; medical mistakes; Vioxx; our faulty system of medical treatment; drug ads educational? conflicts of interest; ethics; corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.) GANGSTERS IN MEDICINE (This article discusses the following issues: JAMA finds traditional medicine the 3rd leading cause of death; statistics on adverse reactions; death toll equivalent to the crash of two fully loaded 747 aircraft daily; pharmaceuticals are not intended to cure; unnecessary surgeries and costs; poor US ranking in world health care; economics of medicine; results of cardiac surgery; history of the AMA; treatment instead of cure; insurance fraud; government coercion; what to do?)
The American Medical System is Broken (This article discusses the following issues: Medicare bankrupt; Death by Medicine leading cause of death and injury in the US; statistics, adverse drug reactions-ADR's, number one cause of unnecessary death in the US; costs; FDA for the people? the war between health and medicine; covert government operations; the government and the pharmaceutical industries do NOT want the problem fixed; what to do?)
SOME SHOCKING FACTS ABOUT HEALTH IN AMERICA (This article discusses the following issues: we are sick and dying unnecessarily and it is getting worse; ABC Nightline story; managing symptoms with drugs has failed miserably; disease is malnutrition.)
Ritalin Research Fraud
(This article discusses the following issues: Research on Ritalin never done.)
Drug Marketing Scheme Hits Nation's School System
(This article discusses the following issues: TeenScreen-drug marketing screen; influence of big pharma blatantly obvious; pharmaceutical money has directly funded TeenScreen; taxpayers now footing the bill; one in every 145 adult subjects who entered trials for the antipsychotics Zyprexa, Risperdal, Seroquel, and Serdolect died; of children tested all experienced adverse effects, none were helped, the study was terminated less than 6 weeks after it began; every one of the so-called "wonder drugs," is now required to carry a black box warning listing the serious and often deadly adverse reactions experienced by both children and adults.)
Vioxx Took a Deadly Toll
(This article discusses the following issues: Death toll of Vioxx - a drug from Merek Pharmaceutical; Vioxx raised a person's risk of coronary heart disease by 34 per cent; data was analyzed 1.4 million people between the ages of 18 and 84 in California; Dr. Graham of the FDA said his supervisors discouraged him from presenting his findings to a drug-safety meeting and threatened him with severe consequences if he went forward.)
Merck, Vaccines and the Vioxx Link
(This article discusses the following issues: growing distrust of drug companies; thimerosal; Merck press release - 1999 re thimersol in vaccines; Merck memo of 1991; Merck and Vioxx; more on mercury and toxicity.)
The Marketing of Drugs
(This article discusses the following issues: The most heavily promoted drugs; promotional expenditures; rise in drug costs.)
Drug Sales Bring Huge Profits, and Scrutiny, to Cancer Doctors
(This article discusses the following issues: the chemotherapy concession; the finances of the cancer industry; chemotherapy and non-responsive cancers; oncologists are busy; insurance reaction.)
How Drug Companies Brainwash Doctors so Doctors Brainwash You with Drugs
(This article discusses the following issues: free samples, pharmaceutical advertising expenditures; the perks start in medical school; marketing vs. research; big pharma is intricately involved in every aspect of medical education and clinical practice; Doctors are too willing to provide expensive, heavily advertised drugs for very minor conditions; we are an overmedicated society.)
THE MYTH OF MEDICINE
(This article discusses the following issues: the cancer racket; people with cancer submitting to traditional treatments live an average of 3 years, those who refuse treatment live an average of 12.6 years.)

 

Statistics Prove Prescription Drugs
Are 16,400% More Deadly Than Terrorists

By Jessica Fraser
From: http://www.newstarget.com/009278.html
July 5, 2005

America was rudely awakened to a new kind of danger on September 11, 2001: Terrorism. The attacks that day left 2,996 people dead, including the passengers on the four commercial airliners that were used as weapons. Many feel it was the most tragic day in U.S. history. Four commercial jets crashed that day.

But what if six jumbo jets crashed every day in the United States, claiming the lives of 783,936 people every year? That would certainly qualify as a massive tragedy, wouldn't it? Well, forget "what if." The tragedy is happening right now. Over 750,000 people actually do die in the United States every year, although not from plane crashes. They die from something far more common and rarely perceived by the public as dangerous: modern medicine.

According to the groundbreaking 2003 medical report Death by Medicine, by Drs. Gary Null, Carolyn Dean, Martin Feldman, Debora Rasio and Dorothy Smith, 783,936 people in the United States die every year from conventional medicine mistakes. That's the equivalent of six jumbo jet crashes a day for an entire year. But where is the media attention for this tragedy? Where is the government support for stopping these medical mistakes before they happen?

After 9/11, the White House gave rise to the Department of Homeland Security, designed to prevent terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Since its inception, billions of dollars have been poured into it. The 2006 budget allots $34.2 billion to the DHS, a number that has come down slightly from the $37.7 billion budget of 2003.

According to the study led by Null, which involved a painstaking review of thousands of medical records, the United States spends $282 billion annually on deaths due to medical mistakes, or iatrogenic deaths. And that's a conservative estimate; only a fraction of medical errors are reported, according to the study. Actual medical mistakes are likely to be 20 times higher than the reported number because doctors fear retaliation for those mistakes. The American public heads to the doctor's office or the hospital time and again, oblivious of the alarming danger they're heading into.

The public knows that medical errors occur, but they assume that errors are unusual, isolated events. Unfortunately, by accepting conventional medicine, patients voluntarily continue to walk into the leading cause of death in America.

According to a 1995 U.S. iatrogenic report, "Over a million patients are injured in U.S. hospitals each year, and approximately 280,000 die annually as a result of these injuries. Therefore, the iatrogenic death rate dwarfs the annual automobile accident mortality rate of 45,000 and accounts for more deaths than all other accidents combined." This report was issued 10 years ago, when America had 34 million fewer citizens and drug company scandals like the Vioxx recall were yet to occur.

Today, health care comprises 15.5 percent of the United States' gross national product, with spending reaching $1.4 trillion in 2004. Since Americans spend so much money on health care, they should be getting a high quality of care, right? Unfortunately, that's not the case.

Of the 783,936 annual deaths due to conventional medical mistakes, about 106,000 are from prescription drugs, according to Death by Medicine. That also is a conservative number. Some experts estimate it should be more like 200,000 because of underreported cases of adverse drug reactions. Americans today are used to fixing problems the quick way - even when it comes to their health. Thus, they rely heavily on prescription drugs to fix their diseases.

For every conceivable ailment - real or not - chances are there's a pricey prescription drug to "treat" it. Chances are even better that their drug of choice comes chock full of side effects. The problem is, prescription drugs don't treat diseases; they merely cover the symptoms. U.S. physicians provide allopathic health care - that is, they care for disease, not health. So, the over-prescription of drugs and medications is designed to treat disease instead of preventing it. And because there are so many drugs available, unforeseen adverse drug reactions are all too common, which leads to the highly conservative annual prescription drug death rate of 106,000.

Keep in mind that these numbers came before the Vioxx scandal, and Cox-2 inhibitor drugs could ultimately end up killing tens of thousands more. American medical patients are getting the short end of a rather raw deal when it comes to prescription drugs.

Medicine is a high-dollar, highly competitive business. But it shouldn't be. Null's report cites the five most important aspects of health that modern medicine ignores in favor of the almighty dollar: Stress, lack of exercise, high calorie intake, highly processed foods and environmental toxin exposure.

All these things are putting Americans in such poor health that they run to the doctor for treatment. But instead of doctors treating the causes of their poor health, such as putting them on a strict diet and exercise regimen, they stuff them full of prescription drugs to cover their symptoms. Using this inherently faulty system of medical treatment, it's no wonder so many Americans die from prescription drugs. They're not getting better; they're just popping drugs to make their symptoms temporarily go away.

But not all doctors subscribe to this method of "treatment." In fact, many doctors are just as angry as the public should be, charging that scientific medicine is "for sale" to the highest bidder - which, more often than not, end up being pharmaceutical companies. The pharmaceutical industry is a multi-trillion dollar business.

Companies spend billions on advertising and promotions for prescription drugs. Who can remember the last time they watched television and weren't bombarded with ads for pills treating everything from erectile dysfunction to sleeplessness?

And who has ever been to a doctor's office or hospital and not seen every pen, notepad and post-it bearing the logo of some prescription drug? Medical experts claim that patients' requests for certain drugs have no effect on the number of prescriptions written for that drug. Pharmaceutical companies claim their drug ads are "educational" to the public.

The public believes the FDA reviews all the ads and only allows the safest and most effective drug ads to reach the public. It's a clever system: Pharmaceutical companies influence the public to ask for prescription drugs, the public asks their physicians to prescribe them certain drugs, and doctors acquiesce to their patients' requests. Everyone's happy, right? Not quite, since the prescription drug death toll continues to rise.

The public seems to genuinely believe that drugs advertised on TV are safe, in spite of the plethora of side effects listed by the commercial's narrator, ranging from diarrhea to death. Patients feel justified in asking their physicians to prescribe them a particular drug they've seen on TV, since it surely must be safe or it wouldn't have been advertised. Remember all those TV ads heralding the wonders of Vioxx? One might wonder how many lives could have been spared if patients didn't see the ad on TV and request a prescription from their doctors.

But advertising isn't the only tool the pharmaceutical industry uses to influence medicine. Null's study cites an ABC report that said pharmaceutical companies spend over $2 billion sending doctors to more than 314,000 events every year.

While doctors are riding the dollar of pharmaceutical companies, enjoying all the many perks of these "events," how likely are they to question the validity of drug companies or their products? Admittedly, not all doctors reside in the pockets of the pharmaceutical companies. Some are downright angry at the situation, and angry on behalf of an unaware public.

Major conflicts of interest exist between the American public, the medical community and the pharmaceutical industry. And although the public suffers the most from this conflict, it is the least informed. The public gets the short end of the stick and they don't even know it. That is why the pharmaceutical industry remains a multi-trillion dollar business.

Prescription drugs are only a part of the U.S. healthcare system's miserable failings. In fact, outpatient deaths, bedsore deaths and malnutrition deaths each account for higher death rates than adverse drug reactions. The problems run deep and cannot be remedied without drastic, widespread change in the system's money and ethics.

The first issue - money - is the main reason the medical industry cannot seem to change. Prescribing more drugs and recommending more surgeries means more profits. Getting more drugs approved by the FDA, regardless of their safety, means more money for the pharmaceutical industry.

As the healthcare system stands today, physicians and drug companies can't seem to pass up earning loads of money, even if a few hundred thousand people lose their lives in the process. Even in drastic cases of deadly drugs, everyone involved has a scapegoat: Drug companies can blame the FDA for approving their product and the doctors for over-prescribing it, and doctors can blame the patients for wanting it and not properly weighing the risks.

What ultimately arises is a question of ethics. In layman's terms, ethics are the rules or moral guidelines that govern the conduct of people or professions. Some ethics are ingrained from childhood, but some are specifically set forth.

For example, nearly all medical schools have their new doctors take a modern form of the Hippocratic Oath. While few versions are identical, none include setting aside proper medical care in favor of money-making practices.

On the research side of the issue, "Death by Medicine" cites an ABC report that says clinical trials funded by pharmaceutical companies show a 90 percent chance that a drug will be perceived as effective, whereas clinical trials not funded by drug companies show only a 50 percent chance that a drug will be perceived as effective. "It appears that money can't buy you love, but it can buy you any 'scientific' result you want," writes Null and his team of researchers.

The government spends upwards of $30 billion a year on homeland security. Such spending seems important. Since 2001, 2,996 people in the United States have died from terrorism - all as a result of the 9/11 attacks. In that same period of time, 490,000 people have died from prescription drugs, not counting the Vioxx scandal. That means that prescription drugs in this country are at least 16,400 percent deadlier than terrorism. Again, those are the conservative numbers. A more realistic number, which would include deaths from over-the-counter drugs, makes drug consumption 32,000 percent deadlier than terrorism.

But the scope of "Death by Medicine" is even wider. Conventional medicine, including unnecessary surgeries, bedsores and medical errors, is 104,700 percent deadlier than terrorism. Yet, our government's attention and money is not put into reforming health care.

Couldn't a little chunk of the homeland security money be better spent on overhauling the corrupt U.S. healthcare system, the leading cause of death in America? Couldn't we forfeit the color-coded threat system in favor of stricter guidelines on medical research and prescription drugs?

No one is attempting to say that terrorism in the world is not a problem, especially for a high-profile country like the United States. No one is saying that the people who died on 9/11 didn't matter or weren't horribly wronged by the terrorists that day. But there are more dangerous things in the United States being falsely represented as safe and healthy, when, in reality, they are deadly.

The corruption in the pharmaceutical industry and in America's healthcare system poses a far greater threat to the health, safety and welfare of Americans today than terrorism. If the Bush Administration really wants to save lives -- a lot of lives -- it needs look no further than the chemical war has been declared on Americans by Big Pharma.

 

GANGSTERS IN MEDICINE
By Thomas Smith December 23, 2002 NewsWithViews.com
(This is a fabulous article that unfortunately still holds true today)

The Journal of the American Medical Association recently reported that as many as 106,000 deaths occur annually in US hospitals due to adverse reactions to prescription drugs that are properly prescribed by physicians that use them as directed by the drug companies.

Even worse, the National Council for Patient Information and Education reported that an additional 125,000 deaths occur annually due to adverse reactions to drugs that the physician never should have prescribed. In these deaths the doctor did not follow the instructions on proper administration of the drugs.

For example, Glucophage, a diabetic oral hypoglycemic, should never be prescribed for patients with kidney disease or congestive heart failure because it can cause fatal lactic acidosis in these patients. A warning label is prominently placed on the medication container to warn of this potential misuse. However, JAMA reported that almost 1/4 of the patients who had been prescribed Glucophage had Kidney damage or Congestive Heart failure or both.

The annual death toll from synthetic prescription drugs, both from the correctly prescribed and the incorrectly prescribed, amounts to about 231,000 deaths every year.

To put this into perspective, this is the equivalent of a world trade center disaster every week for over a year and a half or the crash of two fully loaded 747 aircraft every day of the year.

No information was reported on the number of outpatient and doctor's office deaths caused by these very same drugs when prescribed by these very same doctors. The reported figures alone, however, make drug deaths caused by physicians the third leading cause of death in the US. It is far ahead of accidents, drunk driving, homicides, airline accidents, as well as all other disease with the sole exceptions of cancer and heart disease.

Many of these drugs responsible for the death statistics cited are diabetic drugs.
None of these drugs cure or even were intended to cure diabetes.

During the time a patient is on the drugs his body is suffering great damage due to the uncontrolled progress of the disease. This is in addition to the risk and damage caused by the drug itself. According to Dr. Mendelsohn, author of "Confessions of a Medical Heretic", 2.4 million unnecessary operations are performed every year and they cost over 12,000 lives. When the records of six New York hospitals were examined it was found that 43% of the Hysterectomies that were performed were medically unnecessary.

No one should ever submit to any surgical procedure without first obtaining several unrelated medical opinions, at least not here in the United States. Women are particularly vulnerable to this type of victimization.

Disease in America

According to the World Health Report 2000 the United States ranks twelfth, that is second from the bottom, in their thirteen country survey of sixteen available health indicators. We are dead last for low birth weight and neonatal and infant mortality. We rank between ninth and twelfth for all life expectancy categories between one year and 40 years. Another study ranked the United States as fifteenth in the twenty-five industrialized countries studied.

Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Hyperinsulinemia are so widespread in the United States that it is estimated that over half the population exhibits one or more symptoms of these life-destroying diseases. Symptoms of Adult onset diabetes are now being routinely noted in six-year-old children. Obesity and it's related Endocrine dysfunctions are commonly observed in teenagers. Heart Failure, a symptom of advanced Type II Diabetes, remains in the top three killer diseases in the Westernized countries.

Although the cause and cure for Type II Diabetes and related endocrine failure has been increasingly well understood in the scientific community for the last forty years, this disease is not being cured by todays orthodox treatment regimens. In order to find a cure it is necessary to seek alternative medical approaches to this disease.

The Economics of Medicine

A large part of this medical disaster that the United States currently experiences is due to the way our medical community is organized. Basically it is not organized to heal and to cure disease; the medical community, particularly at its upper levels, is a commercial venture organized to make money for its practitioners.

Although the record of the United States Medical community in the cure of disease is deplorable, the same cannot be said for its ability to produce income and profit. For example, for the top fifteen pharmaceutical companies, including such names as Abbot, Wyeth, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck and others, the second quarter revenue for 2002 was reported as $63,520.6 million and the corresponding reported income was 11,731.8 million respectively. This is second only to the defense industry in the United States.

In 1997, the latest year for which we have the figures, the earnings of physicians were reported by Broad as averaging around $200,000 per year. The lowest reporting specialty, Rheumatology reported $158,500 and the highest, cardiovascular surgeon, reported $363,300. When examining the numbers, we noted that the high salaries seemed to be concentrated in members of the AMA. Those belonging to less powerful trade unions did not fare nearly so well even though they did most of the actual patient care work.

For example, the median staff salary of registered nurses was $35,256. The Cardiac surgeon, for example, does nothing whatsoever to cure cardiac disease. Three to five percent of the heart surgery patients die on the operating table.

Cardiac surgery provides no better three year survival rate
than no treatment at all.

A Harvard survival study of 200,000 patients revealed that the long term survival rate of patients subjected to surgery was no better than the survival rate of those that had no surgery.

Of course, your cardiac surgeon will not tell you this when you need to make a decision on whether or not to elect cardiac surgery. Never in history have so many accumulated so much wealth for providing their customers or clients or patients with so little real benefit.

Exceptions to the Rule

Many doctors of integrity are as much victims of the system as are their patients. Todays doctor is not free to treat disease as his conscience dictates. He is forced to administer approved protocols whether they are known to work or not. To deviate from these approved protocols invites law suits, peer criticism and censure from State medical licensing boards.

This writer knows of two local doctors who tried to buck the establishment and really help their patients. Both lost their license to practice medicine. One is currently working as an administrator in a California hospital and the other has started a nutritional clinic.

Takeover of the American Medical Association

This sad state of affairs is directly traceable to the takeover of the American Medical Association by the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations in the early part of the twentieth century.

At the turn of the century the medical community was in a sad state of disrepair. There were no qualifications to become a doctor. If one wanted to be a doctor it was only necessary to hang out a shingle and start the practice of medicine. Medical schools were poorly financed, often taught contradictory medical philosophies and had little impact on the practice of medicine.

In 1910 the American Medical Association, todays AMA, was on the verge of bankruptcy. Few doctors belonged to it and even fewer paid any attention to it. Quackery of all kinds was rampant. The market was flooded with fake cancer cures and 80 proof liver tonic. It was in this environment that Rockefeller and Carnegie moved in and bought the AMA and then used it to take control of the entire United States medical establishment.

In 1910, Henry Prichard president of the Carnegie foundation, bought control of the AMA for the sum of $10,000. He then financed the publication of the Flexner report, as it was then called, to gain popular support for the changes that were to be made in the medical community. With public backing secured by the publication of the Flexner report, Carnegie and Rockefeller commenced a major upgrade in medical education by financing only those medical schools that taught what they wanted taught. Predictably, those schools that had the financing churned out the better doctors. In return for the financing, the schools were required to teach course material that was exclusively drug oriented. That is why today our doctors are so heavily biased toward synthetic drug therapy and know little or nothing about nutrition. Dr. David Edsall, former dean of Harvard medical school, said "I was, for a period, a professor of Therapeutics and Pharmacology, [at Harvard] and I knew from experience that students were obliged then by me and by others to learn about an interminable number of drugs, many of which were valueless, many of them useless, some probably even harmful...."

For a time, these changes actually improved the practice of medicine in the United States. Then, as the distorted medical curriculum began to churn out doctors whose only concern was prescribing synthetic drugs, things began to deteriorate into what we see today. Today the average medical doctor receives 3 hours or less training on nutrition despite the fact that our bodies are constructed entirely of what we eat and drink.

Today's doctor receives much of his ongoing education from detail men. The detail man is the drug company salesman whose job it is to teach the doctor how to use the latest drugs.

Treatment Instead of Cure

Even with all of this history the medical doctor retained a great deal of his autonomy through the 1930's and into the late 1940's. In 1949 another major change took place in the medical community that set the stage for the disaster we see today. It was in 1949 that the medical community reorganized itself into the competing medical specialty groups we see today.

Prior to 1949 a doctor was a doctor; he dealt with all disease and injury. After 1949 this was not so. The reorganization established many of the specialties that we know today. It was then that the Cardiac Specialist, the Endocrinologist, the Hepatic and Biliary Specialist and many other professional specialty groups were formed.

The symptoms of the then raging epidemic of Type II Diabetes were divided among the specialty groups so that each group had their own set of proprietary symptoms. The story given out for the reorganization was that it would help to focus more attention on the then current Diabetes epidemic. However, in practice it caused the entire medical community to treat their own proprietary symptom set and nobody focused on curing the disease anymore. This was the origin of the "treat the symptom" and "ignore the cause" philosophy that now dominates the entire medical community. This was the turning point event that led to the removal of the word "cure" from the medical vocabulary. Today, if you mention the "c" word around your doctor he will usually glaze over and pretend not to hear you. He only responds to the word "treatment".

Under the Rockefeller and Carnegie influence their pharmaceutical firms started to pour out the vast array of synthetic drugs that the doctors trained to their medical school standards now prescribed almost to the exclusion of any other remedies. Among the first drugs to be marketed this way were the oral hypoglycemic agents. They were deliberately designed to treat the symptom while not curing the disease.

Insurance Fraud

Since the name of the medical game was money, a means had to be devised to provide the patient with money that could only be used to pay for approved medical treatment. Enter the insurance company concept.

Today employees have, as an important part of their remuneration for their work, a health insurance policy. This health insurance policy does not pay for all health related needs; it only pays for those health related services that are approved. These, of course, are the synthetic drug therapies that are known to work poorly, if at all.

In order to secure effective medical treatment from the alternative sector of the economy the patient must pay for it himself; insurance companies specifically exclude virtually all alternative treatment. One wonders why so many continue to pay for an insurance program that cannot, even in principle, be of any real benefit to them.

Government Coercion in Medical Practice

In the ordinary course of events, good medicine would eventually drive out bad medicine. As more and more people discover ways to maintain and improve their health, without drug therapy, they will simply abandon bad medicine and resort to alternative therapies. Indeed, this is happening.

Also happening is a concerted government effort to discredit and declare unlawful those effective therapies that represent the greatest threat to orthodox medicine. In the last fifty years many effective cures have been developed for many of the major killer diseases that we have. In each instance the developer has been branded a quack, his business has been ruined and in some cases he has been sent to jail.

Even with outright governmental attacks on those that would promote effective therapies in America, the tide is turning. More and more Americans are waking up to the reality of our medical community. More and more they are finding it to be a fraud and they are turning to less conventional treatments and modalities.

Informed Americans that require effective medical treatment for anything more serious than a head cold are turning away from orthodox drug quackery in droves. The medical community is trying hard to make it illegal to refuse their treatment.

A major effort is currently underway (Codex) to severely restrict the availability of nutritional supplements to those that use them throughout the world. Our government is seriously considering mandatory vaccination programs.

Many believe that our Food and Drug Administration, FDA, represents the American people and that the FDA acts to insure that our food and drugs are safe and effective. Nothing could be further from the truth. The FDA acts entirely to restrain and manage competition between and among those that manufacture our food and drugs. They do this only for the purpose of minimizing competition in business.

Rockefeller is famous for proclaiming the only sin is competition. Willy Ley, a former head of the FDA, said it best when he said "What the Food and Drug Administration does and what the public thinks that it does are a different as night and day".

Today in America the practice of medicine is not free. It is one of the most tightly controlled commercial enterprises in the world. That is why it produces such extraordinary income for it's favored and such misery, disease and death for its victims.

What to do!

Given the growth of the medical monster that ate the United States, what can we who live here do to effectively manage our own health? Perhaps the single most important thing that we all must do is to recognize that our health is our most important possession. We have no choice but to accept total responsibility for our own health. To leave such an important consideration to someone who clearly has much to gain by lying to us just does not make sense.

Typically, we buy our cars and houses with a great deal more wisdom than we bring to the doctor's office when we go there. The modern orthodox medical community treats symptoms; they do not cure disease. When you visit the doctor, it is perfectly in order for you to ask bluntly whether or not the treatment he wants to give you will cure the disease you have.

Some years ago, when I had a serious case of Type II Diabetes, I asked my doctor that question about the treatment he offered me. First he pretended he did not hear me. When I persisted and made eye contact and repeated the question he replied, "this is the prescribed treatment".

Such an evasive answer to such a direct question sent me to the library where I did the research to get a better answer. I quickly discovered that the drug he offered me would not only not cure the disease, but that it was guaranteed to put me on the road to becoming an invalid long before my time.

Fortunately I rejected his treatment. I went on to search the scientific literature where I quickly found what I needed. It had nothing to do with synthetic drugs. It took me about 3 1/2 months to fully reverse my diabetes. That was seven years ago. The disease remains in full remission to this day.

There is one important caveat that must be mentioned at this point. If you are currently under a doctor's care and are dissatisfied with the results you are getting, do not just stop taking the prescribed medication. Get your doctor, or another doctor if yours will not cooperate, to help wean you off prescription drugs and to help you to devise a workable alternative therapy. Many of these synthetic drugs will produce serious side effects if they are abruptly discontinued. When I had the problem I had not yet taken prescription medication.

After accepting full responsibility for your own health, the second most important consideration is to do your homework and learn about the disease or disability that you have. Buy books, attend seminars, subscribe to newsletters, search the internet, learn about what it takes to actually reverse the disease that afflicts you.

Investigate Alternative Medical Practitioners

Many Naturopaths and Chiropractors can be of great help in actually curing disease. Do not fall for the idea that only doctors are smart enough to understand these things. Look for that unusual doctor that will risk really trying to help you; and, realize that he is taking a substantial risk when he does so. In other words, do the best you can to find something better for yourself than what your doctor offers.

Help Each Other

If you discover something important, don't be afraid to share the information.
Be vocal when government organizations attempt to restrict or deny your access to natural nutritional supplements
. If you are fortunate to find a doctor with this kind of integrity, understand the importance of what you have found and give him all of the support that you can give.

There is a medical doctor in California, we will call him Doctor Q, that refused to compromise his integrity in his practice of medicine. He ended up in jail, put there by his fellow doctors. His patients got together, got him out of jail and had a special bill passed in the State legislature to protect his practice of medicine. Today he still runs a flourishing practice where he ministers to patients from all over this country. He is actually curing disease not just treating it.

Third, after accepting responsibility for your own health and becoming informed, recognize that medicine is a business. Your doctor is a paid consultant just like your electrician or plumber and he is listed in the same yellow pages. You have every right to get the information for which you are paying. When your doctor retreats into arrogance and refuses to provide direct answers to direct questions, consider getting another doctor. There really are many safe and effective therapies that go far beyond drugs. However, we must demand them on the firing line, in the doctor's office, when we need them.

RETURN

 

The American Medical System is Broken...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen Thursday, May 27th, 2004

Everybody knows that the US MEDICARE System will go belly-up in the year 2011. It's going to be, at that point, so costly that the United States simply won't be able to afford it anymore. Foreign owned "Big Pharma" is bleeding us to death. American corporations, right this moment, are cutting back their health care offerings. No one can afford the skyrocketing costs. Health Insurance companies are desperately trying to reduce provider expenditure - and because of that, Americans are being offered a poorer, and poorer, quality of health care. Everything NEW is being banned. Foreign owned "Big Pharma" is bleeding us to death. But, more shocking, is that the system itself is a deadly rip-off of gigantic proportion.

A new study, a compilation of most recent studies, called "Death by Medicine," says: "It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States.

The total number of iatrogenic deaths shown is 783,936,
The 2001 heart disease annual death rate is 699,697;
the annual cancer death rate, 553,251."
The number of people having in-hospital, adverse drug reactions (ADR) to prescribed medicine is 2.2 million.

Dr. Richard Besser, of the CDC, in 1995, said the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections was 20 million.
Dr. Besser, in 2003, now refers to tens of millions of unnecessary antibiotics.

The number of unnecessary medical and surgical procedures performed annually is 7.5 million. The number of people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization annually is 8.9 million."

And that's only the "deaths."

The Lazarou study on Hospital ADR also showed that, besides the 106,000 "deaths," twenty times that number of people had health problems caused by that same hospital Adverse Drug Reaction. There were an additional 2,200,000 health problems caused by Adverse Drug Reaction to drugs in hospitals. It would be reasonable to assume, then, that that factor of twenty times the number of deaths could be applied to all of the death statistics - meaning that in addition to the total 783,936 deaths there were 15,678,720 serious health problems caused by the American Medical System.

Shocked? It gets worse... Wait until you read how slovenly our system actually operates. The top three causes of Unnecessary Deaths in the United States are related to our health care system... The number one cause of unnecessary death in the United States, called Iatrogenic deaths (783,986) is shown in the table below, re-printed by permission of the authors:

Condition ........................Deaths ........ ......Cost ..........................Author

Hospital ADR ..................106,000 deaths ....$12 billion .............Lazarou1 Suh49

Medical error ...................98,000 ................$2 billion ..............IOM6

Bedsores ........................115,000 ..............$55 billion ..............Xakellis7 Barczak8

Infection ..........................88,000 ................$5 billion ..............Weinstein9 MMWR10

Malnutrition ...................108,800 -------- ..................................Nurses Coalition11

Outpatient ADR .............199,000 ........... ..$77 billion ...............Starfield12 Weingart112

Unnecessary Procedures .37,136 ...... .....$122 billion ................HCUP3,13

Surgery-Related ..............32,000 ........ .......$9 billion ...............AHRQ85

TOTAL:........................... 783,936 ...........$282 billion

The number two cause of unnecessary death in the United States is Heart Disease. Statistics show "The 2001 heart disease annual death rate is 699,697."

The number three cause of unnecessary death in the United States is Cancer. Statistics show "the annual cancer death rate, 553,251."

The total number of known unnecessary deaths, per year, directly due to the American Medical System is 2,036,884.

The government regulatory systems "we the people" put into place to make sure this didn't happen have been compromised...

Does anybody, for a minute, believe that the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is working for "we the people?" Don't be absurd. The FDA is managed, completely, by "Big Pharma." Doubt that? Then you aren't watching the drug pricing scam, where prescriptions drugs are marketed in the United States from 2 to 20 times their cost in other countries - and the FDA, literally, is with guns-drawn, raiding companies attempting to import those SAME prescriptions from Canada, Mexico, etc.

Does anybody, for a minute, believe that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is working for "we the people?" Don't be absurd. The FTC is manipulated, completely, by "Big Pharma." Doubt that? Then why has the FTC manufactured a different standard for "health claims" for supplements, herbals, electro-medicine devices, etc - those things that compete with drugs in the health market?

And, how is it that the covert FTC "Operation Cure-All" exists at all?

Congress never authorized the FTC to run covert operations - only the CIA, and other "intelligence" groups can do that. So, how is it that "Operation Cure-All," which I believe is actually run out of a New York ad agency, and has no offices, phone numbers, directors, employees, accountability, etc., is allowed to use the FTC name?

State Licensing Boards have been given the responsibility for regulating health care in America, State by State. Do they do anything to solve the problems listed above? NO, they do not. There is NOT ONE STATE in the United States that has a program to do something about the problems described as the number one killer of Americans - Iatrogenic deaths (783,986). Not one State has a program to put a stop to, or even look at, the problems of Hospital Adverse Drug Reactions (106,000 deaths), medical errors (98,000 deaths), bedsores (105,000 deaths), infections (88,000 deaths), malnutrition (108,800 deaths), outpatient Adverse Drug Reactions (199,000 deaths), unnecessary procedures (37,136 deaths), surgery related (32,000 deaths).

And, what about those 15,678,720 serious health problems caused by the American Medical System? Those numbers INCREASE every year because our State regulatory agencies ignore their responsibilities. The "Support System" has been compromised...

What's the common thread that wends its way through the American Cancer Society, the AIDS network, the local "Run-For-Whatever?" Drug money. All of those above are primarily funded, directly, or indirectly, by "Big Pharma." So the so-called "War on Cancer," the "War on AIDS," the "War on whatever." is ONLY about promoting new expensive drugs - NOTHING ELSE.

But, Worst of All... Worst of all is that the American Medical System KNOWS it's broken, and is taking steps, not to fix its problems, but to destroy those trying to make changes for the better, those trying to make, and keep, people healthy, those focusing on finding cures for Cancer, AIDS, heart disease, etc.. It is trying to maintain the "status quo."

Not only have the agencies "we the people" put in place intentionally ignored the problems in health care, but they have been carefully re-focused to attack solutions that compete with the drugs-surgery paradigm.

There is a real war, with large stakes, going on in North America. It's way bigger than the "war on terrorism." I call it "the war between health and medicine." The FDA, the FTC, some of the State Regulatory Agencies, and a large part of the "Support System" have knowingly, or unknowingly, joined ranks against solutions to the problems.

The FDA, as we know, raids supplement manufacturers, electro-medicine installations, using battering rams, automatic weapons, asset seizure - all the tricks to stop competition against their "big pharma" masters.

The FTC runs the covert "Operation Cure-All," targeting American citizen's attempts to communicate new ideas in health care. But, that isn't all. There's more. For instance, the "Quackbusters," we know, are a subversive organization formed, and funded by twenty-six drug companies, after the American Medical Association (AMA) was ordered by the Federal Court to cease its covert operation against the Chiropractic profession. Their job is to harass market competitors to the drug treatment paradigm. I believe they are run out of a New York ad agency.

The "bible" for the quackbusters, the place where all the "quackbusters" send their unsuspecting victims for allegedly "good information," is the website "quackwatch.com," run by a de-licensed, failed MD out of his basement in Allentown. Pennsylvania.

The quackbuster "flagship," the so-called National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) is currently being run out of the office of its current president, a hair removal and ear-piercing specialist in Braintree, Massachusetts.

The biggest "quackbuster" success was in 1996 when they took over the Federation of Medical Board (FSMB)'s conference in Chicago, and used that meeting to re-focus all of the State Medical Boards away from the Federal Government's definition of "health fraud," (overbilling, un-bundling, etc.). There, they were able to insert their own definition - that "alternatives" to the drug/surgery paradigm was "health fraud."

The FSMB, for all of it's high sounding goals, has NEVER addressed the issue of its individual State members coming down hard on the number one cause of deaths (783,986) - Iatrogenic deaths - in the United States. In fact - they have NEVER brought up the issue at all - and obviously have no intention of doing so. Certainly, they have NO INTENTION of suggesting that their members DO SOMETHING about the problem.

The State of Wisconsin, where I'm working on a problem with the State's Department of Regulation & Licensing (DRL), for instance, has a population of 5,461,710. Extrapolating that to the US population of 284,000,000 we find that Wisconsin has 1/52 of the US population. Dividing 52 into the total number of deaths (2,036,884), and the 15,678,513 health problems, shows that Wisconsin's share was 39,170 total deaths, and 301,513 health problems. And, Wisconsin's DRL prosecutors, I've found, won't prosecute anything BUT alternative practitioners. The over-druggers, the bad surgeons, the bedsore ignorers, the malnutrition deliverers, etc. are perfectly safe in the cheese State.

For years the staff of the California med board, like most other State health regulatory agencies, focused their attacks on "good" doctors - those that stepped out of the drugs, drugs, and more drugs paradigm to find newer and better solutions for their patient problems - and conspicuously ignored the activities of the "bad "doctors - those that were responsible, of late, for making "organized medicine" that number one killer of Americans.

It was, and is, commonly believed that California med board enforcement teams made decisions to spend limited enforcement dollars prosecuting doctors not on the seriousness of their actions, but on their potential to NOT be able to afford a defense. In other words - they went for the "easy hit."

The California based Union of American Physicians & Dentists (UAPD) once told me that about 55% of all California MDs were "solo practitioners," working in small, individual offices - but that 95% of the prosecutions by the med board were filed against those same "solo" practitioners. Why? four reasons, I think.

(1) Because doctors working for hospitals, HMOs, etc., had the protection of HUGE legal defense budgets, and the services of lawyers that could wipe the floor with anything the med board could face them with.

(2) Hospitals will not report MD problems to the Medical Board - hiding from the board their activities - to protect their defective doctors.

(3) State investigators and prosecutors had been focused on prosecuting "good" doctors through alleged "training" (propaganda) provided, I think, by the Federation of State Medical Board (FSMB), and other "quackbuster" influenced, or controlled, groups.

(4) Investigators and prosecutors are, simply, poorly trained in the issues, and functionally incapable, of even understanding the complex issues of health care enforcement.

The California Medical Board recently heard the FINAL report of the "Enforcement Monitor," thrust on them, at our request, by the California legislature. The Board, and the board staff, have already adopted, and put in place, fifty (50) of the sixty-five (65) recommendations in the FINAL report. Within that report is a significant change in focus - and the setting up of the apparatus, including the legislation, and the additional funding necessary, to go after "bad" doctors - with a vengeance.

California, to its credit, has become the first State to proactively address the horrifying fact that "organized medicine" is the number one killer of Americans - and do something about it.

I applaud the members of the California Legislature and the Medical Board for this LANDMARK action. The report, frankly a model for every State, addresses seven basic issues of enforcement - in detail. The report, upwards of two hundred (200) pages outlines how an enforcement agency actually works, and makes recommendations on how to improve it.

So, what do we do with this? This report will be officially presented by delegates of the California Medical Board to the Federation of States Medical Board (FSMB) in April of 2006 - and I have no doubt that the New York ad agency that controls the "quackbuster" operation will conduct a campaign to stop this process from going nationwide. However, the powerful North American Health Freedom Movement has groups in every State.

I urge all of you to consider formally presenting California's actions, and report, to each State's Medical Board - and very nicely, but insistently, demand that they do exactly the same thing - and if they don't - go immediately to the State Capitol, and sit down with the Chairman of the Senate and the House of Representative's Health Committee - and lay the cards on the table...

In summary - we started out to simply get the staff off the backs of cutting edge MDs, and other practitioners in California - and we changed the practice of California medicine forever.

Take a look at the numbers in the graph above - won't it be nice to reduce those numbers to near zero? Yes, this is the biggest victory in the history of health freedom battles EVER. For years we've been fending off attacks from the very people that were massively killing Americans - we've turned the tables. In California we have more to do. "Victory" just makes us work harder.

Foreign owned "Big Pharma" is bleeding us to death. Can We Do Something About It?

Of course we can. And, we are…….Stay tuned... Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate! This "Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter" is about the battle between "Health and Medicine" on Planet Earth. Tim Bolen is an op/ed writer with extensive knowledge of the activities of a subversive organization calling itself the "quackbusters," and that organization's attempts to suppress, and discredit, any, and all health modalities that compete with the allopathic (MD) paradigm for the consumer health dollars.

The focus of the newsletter is on the ongoing activities, battles, politics, and the victories won by members of the "Health Freedom Movement" against the "quackbusters". It details "who the quackbusters are, what they are, where they are operating, when they appear, and how they operate - and how easy it is to beat them..."

For background information on the "Battle between Health and Medicine" go to: http://www.savedrclark.net/by_whom2.htm. A copy of THIS newsletter, and older ones, are viewable at the website http://www.quackpotwatch.org/default.htm. (There is an especially good article there that talks about Chiropractic and the 1978 federal trial findings against the American Medical Association called "The Last Days of the Quackbusters". For EVEN MORE interesting and related articles go to http://www.bolenreport.com.

RETURN

 

SOME SHOCKING FACTS ABOUT HEALTH IN AMERICA

We lead the developed world in deaths from:
* Heart disease
* Prostate cancer
* Breast cancer
* Colorectal cancer
* Diabetes
* Cancer is the leading cause of death by disease in children under age 10.

And even though we spend over 100 billion dollars a year on cancer treatment and research, the overall survival rate for cancer patients is
NO BETTER than it was 50 years ago.

Every 45 seconds someone in the U.S. dies of cancer. That's over 500,000 deaths per year - and most of them are long drawn-out, painful deaths. AND IT'S GETTING WORSE!!

Chronic fatigue, Immune diseases, constipation, PMS, joint pain, hemorrhoids, high cholesterol, premature aging, heart disease, obesity, malnutrition, and breathing difficulties are all on the rise.

The incidence of diabetes in the United States has DOUBLED in just the LAST 5 YEARS!!

50 years ago, diverticular disease (herniations of the colon) was virtually unknown (affecting less than 10% of the American Population.) Today, according to the Merck Manual, 100% of all Americans will have many - if they live long enough.

30 years ago, colorectal cancer was virtually unknown. Today it is the single most prevalent cancer among men and women combined.

The number of Americans who suffer from asthma, according to the Centers for Disease Control, has risen by an astounding 75% in just the last 20 years.

An article in the March 2002 issue of the British Medical Journal found that physicians would rather continue using therapies that are unsafe and ineffective than admit they were wrong to the patients they were seeing.

Breast cancer rates are up 30% in just the last 15 years. And now it's official. In the February 9, 1994 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, the "War on Cancer" was declared a failure. "In all age groups, the incidence of cancer is increasing…Few new, effective treatments have been devised for the most common cancers." · 3 billion prescriptions are written yearly for drugs that treat only symptoms.

AND THE MOST SHOCKING FACT OF ALL: The April 15, 1998 Journal of the American Medical Association reported that there are more than 2,000,000 drug "reactions" annually in the United States, more than 100,000 of those reactions are fatal. This makes prescription drugs the third leading cause of death in America.

But the reality is actually far worse. The number of individuals killed from poor medical judgment, medical malpractice, etc was estimated to be 250,000/yr. Those numbers only count drugs that are prescribed correctly and at the right dose. Not included are patients who are given the wrong drugs, or who are given those drugs at the wrong dosage or in the wrong combination. And these numbers do not include the patients who have fatal reactions to the drugs, but whose deaths are mistakenly attributed to other causes. Nor do these numbers include the patients whose cause of death is deliberately obscured to protect the physicians and hospitals involved. Add in these numbers, and you will find that deaths from adverse reactions to drugs may number as high as 700,000 a year. (Actually the FDA estimates that only 1% of all adverse reactions are reported - which if true, would make 700,000 a very conservative estimate.)

On an ABC News Nightline program, the Harvard School of Public Health found that approximately 1.3 million people a year suffer some kind of injury because of hospital treatment, and 180,000 of those people die. A study by a group of French doctors actually makes that 1% estimate seem wildly optimistic. The study found that only about 1 out of every 24,000 adverse reactions is actually reported by doctors to the appropriate monitoring agency.). Finally if you combine that 700,000 with the numbers of people who die from misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment, or secondary infections received in hospitals, or just plain physician error, and the startling fact you're left with is: the modern medical paradigm, despite all of its accomplishments, is arguably the single leading cause of death in the United States.

At this point in time (2006), it has been well established that medical doctors are the leading cause of death in America. Please understand, this is NOT an attack on medical doctors - the vast majority are extremely competent, highly dedicated, and (as I mentioned earlier) often even heroic.

Nevertheless, it is important to realize that when it comes to the major diseases of our time, the modern medical paradigm of searching for "magic bullets" and managing symptoms with drugs has failed miserably.

REMEMBER: YOUR GOOD HEALTH IS EASIER TO MAINTAIN THAN IT IS TO REGAIN, DISEASE CAN BE PREVENTED AND MOST CAN BE REVERSED.

There is only one disease and that is deficiency. Deficiency creates cellular malfunction, which creates the groundwork for toxicity. Whether you call it a cold or heart disease, the cause is the same: deficiency.

1) You can take control of your health by monitoring what you eat.
2) Every time you sit down to eat YOU CHOOSE what you put in your body.
3) The daily choices you make influence the length and quality of your life.

RETURN

 

Ritalin Research Fraud

The use of the drug Ritalin, commonly given to hyperactive children, is again under scrutiny. Dr. Stephen Breuning, the psychologist who first researched the medication, pleaded guilty in U.S. federal court (9/89) to falsifying his findings.

A National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) investigation showed that Breuning, who was responsible for one-third of the literature on drug therapy for hyperactive children during his research years, "knowingly, willfully and repeatedly engaged in misleading and deceptive practices in reporting results of research," (Ginsburg, S. Baltimore [UPI], November 11, 1989).

Accordingly, the research was never done as described in the grant application to the NIMH, and the results Breuning claimed were never attained. It was the first federal conviction of a researcher for falsifying results. Breuning was sentenced to 60 days in prison, ordered to pay $11,352 in restitution to the University of Pittsburgh (where Breuning worked), and was placed on five years probation by U.S. District Judge Frank Kaufman, who said the former researcher "will pay dearly for the rest of his life." The use of Ritalin is still controversial and has resulted in numerous court battles between schools and parents.

Some doctors say the benefits - increased attention span and performance-outweigh the side affects which may include twitching, depression, violence and sometimes suicidal tendencies. Other doctors feel that most hyperactive children can be treated using more conservative measures. While many of those using A.K. (Applied Kinesiology) have experienced excellent results with these children, further studies are needed to provide a better understanding of this complex problem.

RETURN

 

 

Drug Marketing Scheme Hits Nation's School System

January 26, 2006.
By Evelyn Pringle

TeenScreen, the elaborate drug marketing scheme concocted by the pharmaceutical industry and a front group operating out of Columbia University, is being promoted by the Bush administration's recommendation to screen the nation's school population for mental illness.

The Bush appointed New Freedoms Commission on Mental Health issued a report in July 2003 urging the screening of students in all 50 states and recommended TeenScreen as the model program for the job.

Although touted as a suicide prevention tool, TeenScreen backers also claim it can diagnose a host of mental health disorders in students with the completion of the 10-minute survey. On March 2, 2004, the program's Executive Director, Laurie Flynn, testified at a congressional hearing and said that in the screening process, "youth complete a 10-minute self-administered questionnaire that screens for social phobia, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depression, alcohol and drug abuse, and suicidality."

Warnings against the mass screening of children are coming from every segment of society, including parents, medical professionals, investigative journalists, and human rights groups, in large part, because the influence of pharma in TeenScreen is so blatantly obvious.

For example, prior to joining TeenScreen, Flynn served as the executive director of National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) for 16 years. NAMI calls itself as "a grassroots organization of individuals with brain disorders and their family members."

But in reality, NAMI is pharma's number one front group, dedicated to promoting the sale of as many "legal" drugs as possible. Which means prior to her promotion to the position with TeenScreen, Flynn was the number one "legal" pusher for 16 years.

While employed by NAMI, Pharma paid Flynn's salary. Internal NAMI documents obtained by Mother Jones Magazine, for the period between 1996 and mid-1999, show that 18 drug companies gave NAMI a total of $11.72 million. The firms include Janssen ($2.08 million), Novartis ($1.87 million), Pfizer ($1.3 million), Abbott Laboratories ($1.24 million), Wyeth-Ayerst ($658,000), and Bristol-Myers Squibb ($613,505). The group's top donor during that period was Eli Lilly with total contributions of $2.87 million.

Flynn even wrote an article titled, "Before Their Time: Preventing Teen Suicide," which said: "The TeenScreen Program developed 10 years ago by Columbia University and offered in partnership with the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill helps communities across the nation identify teens with mental illness who might be at risk for suicide."

Now NAMI can hardly dispute the charge that it serves as a funnel for drug money when its web site lists "Corporate Partners, Grants, and Foundations," as Abbott, AstraZoneca, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Forest Lab, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Jannsen, McNeil, Pfizer, and Wyeth.

So if TeenScreen is "offered in partnership," with the NAMI, its logically safe to assume that drug money is involved in the development of the program.

Pharma constantly funnels money through groups like NAMI, which in turn become conduits for the promotion of industry marketing schemes. According to psychiatrist, Dr Peter Breggin, founder of the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology, "these groups hold national meetings that bring together drug advocates to talk directly to consumers. They also put out newsletters and other information that praise medications. Sometimes they actively suppress viewpoints that are critical of drugs - for example, by discouragi